SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Elizabeth R. Lishner

Last decided Los Angeles WestJul 2026
Decisions 2,939since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 67% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a broad view of the decision history, while the latest-period figures offer a snapshot of recent activity. These statistics are derived from 2,939 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 2,939
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lishner Los Angeles West National
Approval rate 78% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 72% — —
Denials 22% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lishner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lishner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Elizabeth R. Lishner has shown a varied trend. After a period of fluctuation between 2016 and 2021, the data shows an upward shift in recent years, with the latest period reaching 78%. This recent performance stands notably higher than the office, state, and national averages for the same timeframe. The latest period reflects a continuation of this recent pattern of higher approval rates compared to the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lishner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Los Angeles West hearing office

Elizabeth R. Lishner's most recent office on record is Los Angeles West, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 62%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical evidence. See the Los Angeles West Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Los Angeles West

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 5 of them deciding cases in the latest file. Approval rates across this bench range from 40% to 67% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions