Elizabeth R. Lishner maintains a 66% lifetime approval rate across 16,884 decisions, which sits above the national average of 58%. In the most recent reporting period, Elizabeth R. Lishner reached an 85% approval rate, outpacing the Los Angeles West office average of 63%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
When evaluating your hearing, compare Judge Lishner's performance against broader benchmarks. Her 66% lifetime approval rate is supported by 16,884 lifetime decisions. In the latest reporting period, she approved 85% of cases, which is 8 percentage points higher than the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting individual hearing outcomes.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lishner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over her 10 years on the bench, Judge Lishner has demonstrated a consistent approach to disability adjudication. Her yearly approval trends show a shift in recent years, moving from a range of 58% to 69% between 2016 and 2021 to a higher frequency of approvals in the most recent period. This trend reflects the evolution of her decision-making process over a decade of service.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lishner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Lishner? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Los Angeles West hearing office
The Los Angeles West Hearing Office serves a large population of claimants across Southern California. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases to meet regional demand. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 63%, reflecting the complex nature of the claims processed in this jurisdiction.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Lishner is essentially random. Within the Los Angeles West Hearing Office, approval rates among the bench vary, ranging from 39% to 66% across the 6 judges. Because case assignment is outside of your control, understanding the general environment of the office is more useful than focusing on any single peer.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
