SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gail Reich

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,568 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Gail Reich reflect a career-long record of 63% across 3,568 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, the 76% approval rate sits 14 points above the Los Angeles West office average of 62%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a look at historical patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 3,568
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Reich Los Angeles West National
Approval rate 76% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 72%
Denials 24%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Reich's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Reich
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Gail Reich has shown an upward trend. After a period of fluctuation between 2018 and 2022, the data indicates a shift toward higher approval rates, reaching 76% in the most recent reporting period. This recent performance represents a divergence from the lifetime average, suggesting a change in the nature of cases or evidence presented. The latest period reflects a continuation of this recent upward pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Reich's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Los Angeles West hearing office

The Los Angeles West hearing office serves a large population in California and is part of a busy regional network. With 9 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 62%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. See the Los Angeles West Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, with lifetime records ranging from 40% to 67%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions