SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Penny Loucas

Last decided ClevelandJul 2026
Decisions 3,126since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While the since-2016 record provides a long-term view, the latest-period figures offer a snapshot of current trends relative to the Cleveland office, state, and national averages. With over 3,000 decisions on record, the data provides a statistically significant look at past outcomes. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 35%
Decisions on record 3,126
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Loucas Cleveland National
Approval rate 34% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 27% — —
Denials 66% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Loucas's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Loucas
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Penny Loucas has shown variability since 2016. After reaching a peak of 45% in 2020, the annual approval rate trended downward, reaching 28% in 2024 and 2025 before seeing a slight increase to 34% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. These patterns are based on 3,126 total decisions on record, and the latest period reflects a departure from the recent multi-year decline.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Loucas's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cleveland hearing office

Penny Loucas's most recent office on record is the Cleveland hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 22 judges who manage a high volume of disability hearings. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 51%, which provides context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Cleveland

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 11 of them deciding cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this group vary widely, ranging from 17% to 70% on their since-2016 records. You can prepare for your hearing regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions