SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sheila Lowther

Last decided Atlanta NorthSep 2025
Decisions 852since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Sheila Lowther is based on 852 decisions on record since 2016. When evaluating this figure, consider the broader context of the Atlanta North hearing office, where the bench of 24 judges shows a wide range of approval outcomes from 24% to 94% on their respective records. These statistics provide a baseline for understanding how different judges approach the evidence in disability claims. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 852

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Lowther. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lowther's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lowther
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Sheila Lowther has maintained a consistent record of approvals. The data shows a 72% approval rate in 2016, 73% in 2017, 65% in 2018, 61% in 2019, 50% in 2022, 61% in 2024, and 66% in 2025. With 852 total decisions on record, the pattern has remained stable over time. This trend suggests that your approach to presenting disability evidence remains the primary factor in your case outcome.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lowther's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta North hearing office

Sheila Lowther's most recent office on record is the Atlanta North hearing office. This office is staffed by a bench of 24 judges who manage a high volume of disability hearings. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence and testimony is central to the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta North

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Atlanta North hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 24% to 94% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the hearing room, understanding the office-wide bench is part of your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions