Lisa Lunsford's most recent office on record is the Oakland hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,462 decisions on record since September 2016, 72% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 26% to 84% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While Lisa Lunsford has a 72% approval rate since 2016, her most recent reporting period shows a 74% approval rate. This latest-period figure sits 8 points above the Oakland office average of 66%, 13 points above the California state average of 61%, and 16 points above the national average of 58%. These figures rely on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable baseline for analysis.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lunsford's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since September 2016, Lisa Lunsford has issued 3,462 decisions. The yearly trend shows a pattern of approvals, with fluctuation between 64% and 77% over the years. The latest reporting period shows a 74% approval rate, which remains consistent with your long-term record. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation, though the recent rate reflects a slight increase compared to the previous year.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lunsford's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Oakland hearing office
Lisa Lunsford's most recent office on record is the Oakland hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across California. With 16 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oakland
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Oakland office, there are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this bench range from 26% to 84% on their since-2016 records.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Lisa Lunsford's latest-period approval rate of 74% is 8 points higher than the Oakland office average of 66%. While this indicates a higher rate of favorable decisions in the most recent period, every case is unique and depends on the specific evidence you provide. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific requirements of the Oakland bench.
Lisa Lunsford's approval rate has remained relatively steady since 2016, with a long-term average of 72% across 3,462 decisions. While there are year-to-year fluctuations, the latest-period rate of 74% is consistent with the overall record. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific disability claim.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency across all hearing offices. Because assignment is random, it is important to be prepared for any judge by having a well-documented case. An attorney can help you prepare for this process.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and hears your testimony. You may be questioned by the judge or a vocational expert about your ability to perform work-related tasks. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions and ensure your medical evidence is clearly presented.
An approval rate is a statistical observation of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. Lisa Lunsford's 72% rate since 2016 provides context for the docket, but your case's success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence. An attorney can help you evaluate your evidence and prepare for the hearing process.




