SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lisa Lunsford

Last decided OaklandJul 2026
Decisions 3,462since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While Lisa Lunsford has a 72% approval rate since 2016, her most recent reporting period shows a 74% approval rate. This latest-period figure sits 8 points above the Oakland office average of 66%, 13 points above the California state average of 61%, and 16 points above the national average of 58%. These figures rely on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable baseline for analysis.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 3,462
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lunsford Oakland National
Approval rate 74% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 64% — —
Denials 26% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lunsford's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lunsford
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since September 2016, Lisa Lunsford has issued 3,462 decisions. The yearly trend shows a pattern of approvals, with fluctuation between 64% and 77% over the years. The latest reporting period shows a 74% approval rate, which remains consistent with your long-term record. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation, though the recent rate reflects a slight increase compared to the previous year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lunsford's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oakland hearing office

Lisa Lunsford's most recent office on record is the Oakland hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across California. With 16 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oakland

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Oakland office, there are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this bench range from 26% to 84% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions