Enrico Alis is an SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Oakland hearing office. Across the 3,601 decisions on record since 2016, 61% have been approved. The office's 16 judges range from 26% to 84% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. While Enrico Alis holds a 61% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period performance shows a 66% approval rate, which aligns with the Oakland office average. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a reliable statistical baseline. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Alis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The record for Enrico Alis spans from 2016 to 2026, showing a steady pattern of approvals. After starting with rates in the mid-50s, the approval frequency trended upward, reaching 66% in the most recent reporting period. This latest figure represents a continuation of his established decision-making history. The recent data suggests a stable approach to evaluating your disability evidence.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Alis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Reading this because a claim was denied? Decode the letter — what the sentence means, what to file, and by when.
About the Oakland hearing office
The Oakland hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for disability adjudications in California. The office maintains a bench of 16 judges on record, with a latest-period approval rate of 66%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Oakland Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Oakland office, there are 16 judges on record since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 26% to 84% on lifetime records. The office's performance provides a broad context for your hearing.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Enrico Alis maintains a 61% lifetime approval rate, placing him within the broad range of 26% to 84% seen across the 16 judges on record at the Oakland office. Because case assignment is random, an attorney can help you prepare your case regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.
Yes, the approval rate for Enrico Alis has shown a gradual upward trend since 2016. While he began with a 56% approval rate in 2016, his latest-period performance reached 66%. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to the evidence in your specific case.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases to judges randomly. An attorney can help you prepare for the hearing process regardless of your assigned judge.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions and not a prediction of how they will rule on your specific claim. Your success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and testimony. An attorney can help you ensure your case is as strong as possible before your hearing.



