SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Catherine Ma

Last decided ClevelandJul 2026
Decisions 2,863since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Catherine MA's 17% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a baseline, while her latest-period approval rate of 8% can be compared against the Cleveland office's latest-period rate of 51%. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,863 decisions on record since 2016, offering a stable view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 17%
Decisions on record 2,863
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ma Cleveland National
Approval rate 8% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 5% — —
Denials 92% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ma's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ma
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Catherine MA has issued 2,863 decisions. Her approval rate has fluctuated over this period, moving from 26% in 2016 to 9% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. The latest-period approval rate of 8% is lower than her long-term average. These trends reflect past activity rather than a fixed outcome for your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ma's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cleveland hearing office

Catherine MA's most recent office on record is the Cleveland hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 22 judges, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 51%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your disability. You can see the Cleveland hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Cleveland

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Cleveland office, with 11 of them deciding cases in SSA's latest file. Approval rates among this bench range from 17% to 70% on their since-2016 records. You can view the Cleveland hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions