Bruce W. MacKenzie's most recent SSA record (September 2018) is at the Birmingham hearing office. Across 1,037 decisions on record since 2016, 28% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 28% to 85% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for this specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 28% approval rate for Bruce W. MacKenzie reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 28% to 85% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different benches approach disability claims.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge MacKenzie. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge MacKenzie's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Bruce W. MacKenzie across 1,037 decisions on record since 2016 shows a variable trend. The data indicates an approval rate of 25% in 2016, which rose to 34% in 2017 before shifting to 23% in 2018. This fluctuation suggests that the decision-making pattern has not remained static over the recorded period.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge MacKenzie's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Birmingham hearing office
Bruce W. MacKenzie's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, which serves you in Alabama. This office is part of a broader network of SSA hearing locations where bench sizes and approval rates vary significantly. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical and vocational evidence.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 28% to 85%. Seven of these judges decided cases at this office in the most recent SSA file from July 2026.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Bruce W. MacKenzie has an approval rate of 28% based on 1,037 decisions since 2016. This is at the lower end of the 28% to 85% range observed among the 23 judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham. An attorney can help you prepare your case for this specific bench.
Yes, the approval rate has fluctuated over the recorded period. It was 25% in 2016, increased to 34% in 2017, and was 23% in 2018. An attorney can help you understand how these patterns might relate to your specific claim.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases randomly to ensure efficiency. An attorney can help you prepare a strong case regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be questioned by the judge or a vocational expert about your ability to perform work. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions and present your evidence effectively.
The 28% approval rate on record since 2016 is a historical statistic, not a prediction of your outcome. Every case is unique, and the quality of your medical evidence is the most important factor in a decision. An attorney can help you gather the necessary documentation to support your claim.




