SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bruce W. MacKenzie

Last decided BirminghamSep 2018
Decisions 1,037since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 28% approval rate for Bruce W. MacKenzie reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 28% to 85% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different benches approach disability claims.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 28%
Decisions on record 1,037

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge MacKenzie. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge MacKenzie's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge MacKenzie
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Bruce W. MacKenzie across 1,037 decisions on record since 2016 shows a variable trend. The data indicates an approval rate of 25% in 2016, which rose to 34% in 2017 before shifting to 23% in 2018. This fluctuation suggests that the decision-making pattern has not remained static over the recorded period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge MacKenzie's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

Bruce W. MacKenzie's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, which serves you in Alabama. This office is part of a broader network of SSA hearing locations where bench sizes and approval rates vary significantly. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 28% to 85%. Seven of these judges decided cases at this office in the most recent SSA file from July 2026.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions