SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sharon L. Madsen

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fresno Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 7,818 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Madsen?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Madsen has issued 7,818 lifetime decisions during a 4-year tenure. When comparing the latest reporting period to the Fresno Hearing Office average of 62%, Judge Madsen's rate is 25 percentage points lower. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the judge's historical decision-making. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Madsen Fresno National
Approval rate 37% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 31%
Denials 63%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Madsen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Madsen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The yearly trend for Judge Madsen shows an approval rate of 38% in 2016, 38% in 2017, and 37% in 2018. The most recent data from 2019 shows a shift to 31%. This pattern reflects the judge's historical approach to evaluating evidence. The recent change may reflect shifts in case mix or the quality of evidence presented in court.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Madsen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Madsen? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fresno hearing office

The Fresno Hearing Office serves a significant population in California and manages a high volume of SSDI claims. The office maintains an average approval rate of 62%, which is higher than the national average of 58%. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can view the full ALJ roster on the Fresno Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Fresno Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 37% to 73%. Because of this variance, understanding the local bench is helpful for your preparation. You can find more information on the Fresno Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions