SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sharon L. Madsen

Last decided FresnoSep 2019
Decisions 1,139since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 36% approval rate for Sharon L. Madsen reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which we measure against the 36% to 72% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Fresno. This comparison provides a clear view of how this judge's record aligns with the local bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 36%
Decisions on record 1,139

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Madsen. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Madsen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Madsen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Sharon L. Madsen has shown a slight downward trend over the years on record. Starting at 38% in 2016, the rate remained at 38% in 2017 before shifting to 36% in 2018 and 31% in 2019. With 1,139 total decisions on record, this pattern provides a consistent look at how the judge has approached cases over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Madsen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fresno hearing office

The Fresno hearing office serves you if you are in the region. There are 6 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 66%. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fresno

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 6 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 36% to 72%. Because each judge brings a different perspective to the hearing room, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your case preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions