SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Daniel J. Mages

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Indianapolis Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 26,508 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Mages maintains a lifetime approval rate of 67% across 26,508 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate reached 74%, which is higher than the 61% office average and the 58% national average. These figures provide a historical baseline for his judicial activity, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Mages Indianapolis National
Approval rate 67% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 69%
Denials 26%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mages's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mages
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Mages has maintained a consistent approach to disability adjudication. While his annual approval rate has fluctuated—ranging from a low of 61% in 2021 to a high of 73% in 2025—the overall trend remains steady. Recent decisions show a higher frequency of favorable outcomes compared to the middle of his tenure, reflecting the judge's current approach to the evidence presented in his courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mages's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Mages? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

The Indianapolis Hearing Office serves a large population across Indiana, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an environment where caseloads are distributed to ensure timely processing. The office-wide approval rate currently sits at 61%, reflecting the broader regional trends in disability adjudication.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you have no control over which judge hears your case. At the Indianapolis Hearing Office, the bench includes 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 48% to 72%. This variance highlights why understanding the local judicial environment is useful for your preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions