SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Albert J. Velasquez

Last decided IndianapolisSep 2025
Decisions 4,147since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data windows. Albert J. Velasquez's 72% approval rate reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which you can measure against the 43% to 75% range of his peers at the Indianapolis hearing office over that same period. This volume of 4,147 decisions provides a view of his past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 4,147

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Velasquez. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Velasquez's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Velasquez
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Albert J. Velasquez has shown variation, peaking at 81% in 2023 before settling at 73% in 2025. With 4,147 total decisions on record, the data reveals a judge who has maintained a consistent presence in the Indianapolis office. While yearly fluctuations occur, the overall trend reflects a stable approach to disability adjudication.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Velasquez's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

Albert J. Velasquez's most recent SSA record (September 2025) is at the Indianapolis hearing office, which serves you across Indiana. This office is home to 20 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Indianapolis hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Indianapolis

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Indianapolis hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 43% to 75% on their since-2016 records. Because this assignment process is automated, you cannot choose your judge. You can find more information on the Indianapolis hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions