SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael Mannes

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Mcalester Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 21,752 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to office and national benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Mannes maintains a lifetime approval rate of 40% based on 21,752 decisions, while the latest reporting period shows a 47% approval rate. This latest figure is 11 points lower than the Mcalester office average and 18 points below the national average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Mannes Mcalester National
Approval rate 40% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 35%
Denials 53%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mannes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mannes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 9 years on the bench, Judge Mannes has seen his approval rates fluctuate. After a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2019, the trend has shown a gradual increase, reaching 49% in 2024 before settling at 47% in 2025. These shifts often reflect changes in the types of cases assigned or the quality of evidence presented in the courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mannes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Mannes? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mcalester hearing office

The Mcalester Hearing Office serves you if you are in Oklahoma and parts of the surrounding region. With a bench of 4 judges, the office manages a significant volume of disability claims. The office currently maintains a latest-period approval rate of 51%. You can find more information about the local administrative environment by visiting the Mcalester Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. At the Mcalester Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 36% to 50%. Because assignment is outside of your control, the most effective strategy is to focus on the strength of your medical evidence.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions