SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stephen Marchioro

Last decided BillingsSep 2024
Decisions 2,876since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Stephen Marchioro is calculated based on 2,876 decisions on record since 2016. When compared to the bench at the Billings hearing office, where other judges range from 32% to 70% in their own since-2016 records, this figure provides a view into past decision patterns. These statistics are derived from Social Security Administration data to help you understand the landscape of your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 2,876

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Marchioro. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Marchioro's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Marchioro
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Stephen Marchioro has shown an upward trend. After starting at 32% in 2016, the rate remained relatively steady before increasing in recent years, reaching 61% in 2024. This shift across his 2,876 decisions on record suggests that the most recent period reflects a departure from his earlier approval patterns. Such trends often correlate with changes in case evidence or the specific types of claims presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Marchioro's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Billings hearing office

The Billings hearing office serves you across Montana and the surrounding region. It is home to a bench of 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal process where the quality of medical documentation is the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Billings

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the assignment is effectively random. At the Billings hearing office, there are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with approval rates ranging from 32% to 70%. Because you cannot choose your judge, your focus should remain on building a strong, evidence-based case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions