SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paula M. Martin

Last decided Portland ORJul 2026
Decisions 4,207since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at the same timeframes. While you see a 66% approval rate across all 4,207 decisions on record since 2017, recent data shows a 66% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 2 points above the Portland OR office average of 64%, 5 points above the state average of 61%, and 8 points above the national average of 58%. These figures reflect recent trends rather than the judge's long-term average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 4,207
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Martin Portland OR National
Approval rate 66% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 56% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Martin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Martin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Paula M. Martin has issued 4,207 decisions on record since June 2017. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 71% in 2017 to a low of 53% in 2021, followed by a period of higher approvals peaking at 78% in 2024. The most recent fiscal year-to-date data shows a 66% approval rate, which aligns closely with the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Martin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland OR hearing office

The Portland OR hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region. This office currently has 12 judges on record, and it maintains a latest-period approval rate of 64%. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality is the primary driver of the decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Portland OR

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Portland OR office, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this bench range from 34% to 66% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions