SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Linda Thomasson

Last decided Portland ORJul 2026
Decisions 4,214since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Linda Thomasson's performance requires looking at both long-term records and recent trends. Her 66% approval rate since 2016 is at the upper end of the range for the Portland OR bench, which varies from 34% to 66%. In the most recent reporting period, she approved 70% of cases, which is 6 points higher than the office average of 64%. These figures are based on 4,214 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 4,214
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Thomasson Portland OR National
Approval rate 70% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 60% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Thomasson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Thomasson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Linda Thomasson's approval rate has shown notable shifts since 2016. After starting at 38% in 2016, the rate climbed, peaking at 83% in 2021 before moderating. The 70% approval rate seen in the latest period remains consistent with this broader trend of higher approval levels compared to her earliest years on record. This pattern reflects the evolution of her docket across the 4,214 decisions analyzed.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Thomasson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland OR hearing office

The Portland OR hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region. It is staffed by 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, and the office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 64%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Portland OR

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Portland OR office. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, from 34% to 66%. Preparation remains the most effective way to manage your case regardless of which judge is assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions