SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stephanie Martz

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 951 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The 41% approval rate for Stephanie Martz is based on cases heard between 2016 and 2019. When comparing this to the broader Seattle bench, where lifetime approval rates range from 21% to 93%, it is clear that individual judicial patterns vary widely. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your expectations during the hearing process.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 951

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Martz. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Martz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Martz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Stephanie Martz spans from 2016 to 2019, covering 951 lifetime decisions. Her yearly approval trend shows a decline, moving from 45% in 2016 to 31% in 2019. This shift suggests a change in approval patterns over the observed window. While these numbers provide a historical view of her docket, the outcome of your case will depend on the specific medical evidence and testimony you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Martz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seattle hearing office

The Seattle hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a central hub for disability adjudications in Washington. The office maintains a diverse bench of 22 judges on record since 2016, reflecting a wide spectrum of decision-making styles. You can expect a formal legal proceeding where the quality of medical documentation is paramount.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Seattle hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 22 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 4 judges currently reporting in the latest SSA data. With lifetime approval rates across the office ranging from 21% to 93%, the judge assigned to your case can have a meaningful impact on the process.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions