SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Roland D. Mather

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Louisville Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 441 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Mather?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your claim, it is helpful to look at how Judge Mather's approval rate compares to broader benchmarks. With a lifetime rate of 69%, this judge currently trends 15 percentage points above the Louisville Hearing Office average and 11 points above the national average. These figures are derived from a docket of 441 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of historical patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Mather Louisville National
Approval rate 69% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 59%
Denials 31%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mather's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mather
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a tenure spanning 1 year, Judge Mather has maintained a consistent approval pattern. The data shows a 69% approval rate, which aligns with the judge's lifetime average. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation, though every claim remains unique based on the medical evidence you provide.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mather's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Mather? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Louisville hearing office

The Louisville Hearing Office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, managing a high volume of disability cases. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 54%, this location handles a diverse range of medical and vocational evidence. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific requirements of 20 CFR 404.1520. You can visit the Louisville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Louisville Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges on the bench range from 45% to 69%. Because of this variance, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your hearing preparation. The office-wide trends provide a broader context for the local judicial environment.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions