SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul McAdam

Last decided Covington GAJul 2026
Decisions 3,371since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Paul McAdam has a 67% approval rate across his total record since 2016, his latest-period performance shows a 77% approval rate. This latest figure sits 13 percentage points above the Covington GA office average of 64% for the same period. With 3,371 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of his historical pattern.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 3,371
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McAdam Covington GA National
Approval rate 77% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 70% — —
Denials 23% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McAdam's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McAdam
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Paul McAdam has maintained a consistent volume of decisions, with his annual approval rate fluctuating between a low of 59% in 2018 and a high of 77% in the most recent partial year of 2026. After a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2019, the trend has shown a steady increase in recent years. The latest reporting period reflects a continuation of this upward pattern, diverging from his long-term average as he has approved a higher percentage of cases.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McAdam's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Covington GA hearing office

The Covington GA hearing office maintains a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 64%. You can see the Covington GA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Covington GA

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Covington GA office, and 8 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 41% to 88% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions