SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. L. Ellis Davis

On record 3,764 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing judicial performance requires looking at consistent data sets. L. Ellis Davis has a lifetime approval rate of 69%, which sits within the 41% to 88% range observed across the Covington GA bench. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded a 60% approval rate. These figures, derived from 3,764 lifetime decisions, provide a stable view of the judge's record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 3,764
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Davis Covington GA National
Approval rate 60% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 40%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Davis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Davis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for L. Ellis Davis has shown fluctuations since 2016, with yearly performance ranging from a low of 60% in 2026 to a high of 78% in 2022. This trend reflects a varied pattern over the last decade of reporting. While the most recent period shows a 60% approval rate, this sits against a long-term lifetime average of 69%. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence you present during a given year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Davis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Covington GA hearing office

The Covington GA hearing office serves you throughout the region. With 15 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 64%. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your disability claim. You can see the Covington GA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges on record at this office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the latest period. With a broad office-wide lifetime approval range of 41% to 88%, the specific judge assigned to your case can influence the hearing environment. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions