SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Marni R. McCaghren

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Mobile Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 18,374 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge McCaghren?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both their long-term history and recent trends. Judge McCaghren maintains a 63% lifetime approval rate, based on 18,374 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, her 60% approval rate remains 5 percentage points higher than the national average of 58%. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting outcomes for your specific hearing.

Metric Judge McCaghren Mobile National
Approval rate 63% 73% 58%
Fully favorable 50%
Denials 40%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McCaghren's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McCaghren
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 10 years on the bench, Judge McCaghren has maintained a consistent approval profile. While annual rates have fluctuated between 60% and 66%, the data shows a stable approach to case evaluation. The latest period's 60% approval rate is consistent with her historical performance, suggesting that her decision-making framework remains steady. This continuity allows for a clearer understanding of how evidence is typically weighed in her courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McCaghren's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge McCaghren? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

The Mobile Hearing Office serves a broad population across Alabama, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 6 judges on the bench, the office processes cases with a focus on regional consistency. The office-wide latest approval rate of 73% reflects the local environment in which these hearings occur. You can visit the Mobile Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your specific judge is assigned randomly. Within the Mobile Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 54% to 76%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to approach any hearing. Guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions