SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Janet McCamley

Last decided Tallahassee Fl OHOSep 2025
Decisions 2,981since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. While the office bench shows a wide range of outcomes from 34% to 77% since 2016, these figures reflect the diverse caseloads and decision patterns of the 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tallahassee FL OHO. With 2,981 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 2,981

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge McCamley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McCamley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McCamley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, your approval rate for Janet McCamley has remained relatively steady across 2,981 decisions on record. While the rate reached 62% in 2017 and 2020, it has also seen periods such as the 51% rate observed in 2025. These variations are common in SSDI dockets and often correlate with changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McCamley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tallahassee Fl OHO hearing office

Janet McCamley's most recent office on record is the Tallahassee FL OHO, which serves claimants across the Florida region. This office is home to 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 68%, providing context for the local hearing environment. You can see the Tallahassee FL OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tallahassee Fl OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tallahassee FL OHO, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 34% to 77%. The office's bench reflects a variety of decision patterns, and you should prepare for your hearing regardless of which judge is assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions