SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lisa Raleigh

Last decided Tallahassee Fl OHOJul 2026
Decisions 3,103since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While Lisa Raleigh maintains a 52% approval rate on record since 2016, her latest-period approval rate of 51% sits 17 points below the Tallahassee FL OHO latest-period average of 68%. These figures rely on a volume of 3,103 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 3,103
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Raleigh Tallahassee Fl OHO National
Approval rate 51% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 44% — —
Denials 49% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Raleigh's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Raleigh
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Lisa Raleigh has maintained a consistent approval pattern across 3,103 decisions. After an initial period of fluctuation, including a high of 57% in 2017, the rate has held near the 50% mark in recent years. The latest-period data shows a 51% approval rate, which aligns with your long-term average. This stability suggests a predictable approach to evidence evaluation, though your individual case outcome depends on the medical documentation you provide.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Raleigh's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tallahassee Fl OHO hearing office

Lisa Raleigh's most recent office on record is the Tallahassee FL OHO. This office features a bench of 9 judges with varying approval patterns, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate stands at 68%. You should focus on building a robust medical record to support your specific disability claim. You can see the Tallahassee FL OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tallahassee Fl OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, from 34% to 77% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions