SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jack D. McCarthy

Last decided Kansas CitySep 2019
Decisions 983since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's approval rate requires looking at the broader context of their hearing office. While Jack D. McCarthy has an approval rate of 59% since 2016, the bench at the Kansas City hearing office shows a wide range of outcomes, with peer judges varying from 33% to 77% over the same period. These figures are based on 983 decisions on record, providing a look at past patterns.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 983

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge McCarthy. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McCarthy's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McCarthy
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Jack D. McCarthy has shown fluctuation since 2016. After a 59% approval rate in 2016, the figures moved to 57% in 2017 and rose to 61% in 2018, before settling at 54% in 2019. With 983 total decisions on record, these variations reflect how case mix and evidence quality influence outcomes year over year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McCarthy's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kansas City hearing office

The Kansas City hearing office serves as a hub for disability hearings in Missouri. This office features a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary driver of the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kansas City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Kansas City hearing office, and they show a broad spectrum of approval rates ranging from 33% to 77%. Because your specific judge is determined by this automated process, you cannot request a change.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions