SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Martin McClelland

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Cleveland Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 3,132 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge McClelland maintains a lifetime approval rate of 36% based on 3,132 total decisions. Compared to the latest reporting period, the judge's approval rate is lower than the Cleveland office average of 53% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant docket size, providing a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge McClelland Cleveland National
Approval rate 36% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 31%
Denials 64%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McClelland's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McClelland
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over four years on the bench, Judge McClelland has demonstrated a consistent trend in approval activity. Starting at 28% in 2016, the annual approval rate showed a gradual increase, reaching 43% by 2019. This upward trajectory reflects changes in the cases heard or the evidence presented during those years. The latest data shows a steady pattern as the judge manages a complex caseload.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McClelland's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge McClelland? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cleveland hearing office

The Cleveland Hearing Office serves a broad population across Ohio, managing a high volume of SSDI claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 53%, reflecting the regional complexity of disability claims. You can expect a formal process focused on objective medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Cleveland Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Cleveland Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 36% to 65%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent across all courtrooms. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions