SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patricia Melvin

Last decided Jackson Ms OHOJul 2026
Decisions 4,263since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Patricia Melvin's performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, her 46% approval rate is measured against the Jackson MS OHO office rate of 55%, the Mississippi state rate of 55%, and the national average of 58%. These figures rely on 456 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Melvin Jackson Ms OHO National
Approval rate 46% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 38% — —
Denials 54% — —
Decisions 456 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 4,263

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Melvin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Melvin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Patricia Melvin has issued 4,263 decisions with an overall approval rate of 41%. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with approval rates moving from 37% in 2016 to 47% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. The most recent 12 months sit slightly above the long-term record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Melvin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jackson Ms OHO hearing office

The Jackson MS OHO is the most recent office on record for Patricia Melvin as of July 2026. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the office maintained an approval rate of 55%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the evidence in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Jackson Ms OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 5 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 44% to 70% over the 12-month window ending July 31, 2026. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 5 of whom decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Melvin's 46%. Three of them last decided cases in Mississippi. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Atlanta region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Melvin and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions