SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Thomas Merrill

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Manchester Hearing Office · 8 years on the bench · 12,237 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Merrill's approval rate is 33 percentage points below the Manchester Hearing Office average of 59%. This data is drawn from a docket of 12,237 lifetime decisions accumulated over 8 years on the bench. Comparing these figures to the national average of 58% helps you understand the statistical environment of your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Merrill Manchester National
Approval rate 26% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 22%
Denials 74%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Merrill's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Merrill
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 8-year tenure, Judge Merrill has maintained a consistent pattern of decision-making. His approval rate saw a slight decline from 30% in his early years to a more recent baseline near 24%. This trend has remained relatively stable throughout the latest reporting periods, suggesting a predictable approach to evidence evaluation. The recent data reflects a continuation of this steady pattern rather than a significant shift in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Merrill's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Merrill? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Manchester hearing office

The Manchester Hearing Office serves you throughout New Hampshire, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an overall approval rate of 59%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary driver of the outcome. You can see the Manchester Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Judge Merrill is essentially random. Across the Manchester Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 26% to 64%. Because of this variance, understanding the office-wide environment is as important as looking at any single judge. You can find more information on the office's overall performance on the Manchester Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions