SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Christopher Messina

Last decided St Petersburg Fl OHOJul 2026
Decisions 2,377since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to compare Christopher Messina's performance against the broader bench. While his 68% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a baseline, the 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL OHO show a wide range of outcomes. In the most recent reporting period, Christopher Messina's 70% approval rate sits 7 points above the office average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 2,377
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Messina St Petersburg Fl OHO National
Approval rate 70% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 68% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Messina's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Messina
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Christopher Messina has maintained a consistent pattern across his 2,377 decisions. While approval rates fluctuated between a low of 61% in 2016 and a high of 81% in 2024, the recent trend shows a steady alignment with his long-term average. The 70% approval rate observed in the latest reporting period reflects a continuation of this stable pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Messina's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Petersburg Fl OHO hearing office

The St Petersburg FL OHO is the most recent office on record for Christopher Messina, with his last decision there dated July 2026. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims, with an office-wide latest approval rate of 63%. You can see the St Petersburg FL OHO hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is St Petersburg Fl OHO

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL OHO. Approval rates for this bench vary significantly, ranging from 35% to 85% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions