SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alan E. Michel

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Mobile Hearing Office · 5 years on the bench · 8,294 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Michel?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Michel maintains a lifetime approval rate of 71%, a figure derived from 8,294 lifetime decisions over his 5-year tenure. When compared to the most recent reporting period, his approval rate remains higher than the 58% national average and the 65% state average. This statistical volume provides a look at his decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Michel Mobile National
Approval rate 71% 73% 58%
Fully favorable 60%
Denials 29%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Michel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Michel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 5 years on the bench, Judge Michel has shown an upward trend in approval rates. Starting at 67% in 2016, his approval frequency climbed to 81% by 2020. This shift suggests a pattern of evaluation that has evolved over his tenure. The recent period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, moving beyond his initial years of service.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Michel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Michel? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

The Mobile Hearing Office serves a population of claimants across Alabama and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a volume of cases to ensure access to disability benefits. The office currently reports an approval rate of 73%, reflecting the local administrative environment. You can see the Mobile Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the Mobile Hearing Office, the bench of 6 judges shows a range of lifetime approval rates, spanning from 54% to 76%. Because of this variance, the judge you draw can influence the procedural flow of your hearing. You can find more information on the Mobile Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions