SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alan E. Michel

Last decided MobileSep 2020
Decisions 1,374since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. We evaluate the 72% approval rate on record since 2016 against the broader bench at the Mobile Hearing Office, where peers range from 28% to 81% over the same period. This comparison provides a clearer picture of how individual judicial patterns align with local office trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 1,374

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Michel. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Michel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Michel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Alan E. Michel has shown an upward trend since 2016. Starting at 66% in 2016, the rate reached 82% by 2020 across 178 decisions. This pattern reflects a steady increase in approvals over the 1,374 total decisions on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Michel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

The Mobile Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Alabama and the surrounding region. With a bench of 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 75%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Mobile Hearing Office, with approval rates ranging from 28% to 81% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions