Aaron M. Morgan is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the New York Varick Hearing Office, with a lifetime approval rate of 43% over 1,988 lifetime decisions. This sits below the national average of 58%. Because case assignment is random, understanding this judge's history is a vital step in your preparation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Morgan has issued 1,988 lifetime decisions during his 10 years on the bench. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate was 49%, which is 15 percentage points below the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your hearing preparation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morgan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over the past decade, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated, ranging from 24% in 2021 and 2024 to a high of 60% in 2017. The most recent data from 2025 shows a 50% approval rate. This trend reflects how your judge's decision-making responds to evolving case evidence and administrative priorities.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morgan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Morgan? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the New York Varick hearing office
The New York Varick Hearing Office manages a high volume of Social Security Disability Insurance claims. The office currently maintains an office-wide approval rate of 71%, which is higher than the state average of 65% and the national average of 58%. You can visit the New York Varick Hearing Office page for more information on the office roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The New York Varick Hearing Office uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. The bench at this office is diverse, with lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs ranging from 43% to 83%. While your specific judge is determined by the SSA, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of your assignment.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
