SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Aaron M. Morgan

Last decided New York VarickJul 2026
Decisions 821since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 48% approval rate for Aaron M. Morgan covers all decisions on record since 2016, while the latest-period figures provide a snapshot of recent activity. When reviewing these metrics, consider that the docket size of 821 decisions provides a stable baseline for analysis. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 821
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Morgan New York Varick National
Approval rate 51% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 49% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morgan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morgan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Aaron M. Morgan has fluctuated across the 821 decisions on record since January 2016. The most recent data shows a 51% approval rate for the latest period. This recent figure reflects a shift compared to the overall average on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morgan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York Varick hearing office

Aaron M. Morgan's most recent office on record is the New York Varick hearing office, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 66%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in the decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates for this bench range from 48% to 85% based on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions