SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Aaron M. Morgan

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 821 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Aaron M. Morgan's lifetime record of 48% sits within the 48% to 85% lifetime approval range observed among all judges at the New York Varick office. In the most recent reporting period, the 51% approval rate is evaluated against current office, state, and national benchmarks. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 821
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Morgan New York Varick National
Approval rate 51% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 49%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morgan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morgan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Aaron M. Morgan has experienced fluctuations, moving from 56% in the early part of the record to 51% in the most recent period. The data shows a varied yearly trend, with activity peaking in recent years as the docket grew to 821 lifetime decisions. This pattern reflects a judge who manages a high volume of cases, with the latest period showing a continuation of recent activity levels. These trends provide a window into past decision-making but do not dictate the outcome of your specific case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morgan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York Varick hearing office

The New York Varick hearing office serves you throughout the New York region. With a bench of 10 judges on record, this office manages a high volume of disability claims under the oversight of the Social Security Administration. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 66%, reflecting the broader environment in which your hearing occurs. You can see the New York Varick Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at the New York Varick office since 2016, with 5 judges reporting in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 48% to 85% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions