SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Latanya White Richards

Last decided New York VarickJul 2026
Decisions 2,902since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall rate since 2017 is 61%, her latest-period approval rate is 70%, which sits 4 points above the New York Varick office average of 66%. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,902 decisions, providing a stable data set for review. These metrics reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your upcoming hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 2,902
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Richards New York Varick National
Approval rate 70% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 63% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Richards's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Richards
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2017, the approval rate for Latanya White Richards has shown an upward trend. After an initial period of fluctuation, the rate has climbed from 50% in 2018 to 70% in 2026. This latest-period performance represents a shift compared to the historical average on record. The recent data suggests a consistent pattern of approvals, though changes in case mix or evidence quality often influence these yearly shifts.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Richards's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York Varick hearing office

The most recent office on record for Latanya White Richards is New York Varick, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves the New York region and maintains a bench of 10 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period is 66%, reflecting the local environment for disability claims. You can review the New York Varick Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick, with 5 of them deciding cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this group range from 48% to 85% on their records since 2016. Your preparation strategy remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions