SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kerry Morgan

Last decided Franklin TNJul 2026
Decisions 3,904since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While the 67% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, your recent performance is measured against the latest reporting period. In the latest period, the 66% approval rate sits 11 points above the Franklin TN office average of 55%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing statistical confidence. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 3,904
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Morgan Franklin TN National
Approval rate 66% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 61% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morgan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morgan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Kerry Morgan has shown a varied trend, beginning at 72% and moving through several fluctuations before reaching 66% in the most recent period. With 3,904 total decisions on record, the data reflects a consistent volume of activity. While yearly rates have shifted, the latest period reflects a steady pattern of approvals. This trend suggests that your case outcome is influenced by the specific evidence you present in your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morgan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Franklin TN hearing office

The Franklin TN hearing office maintains a bench of 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 55%, providing a baseline for the local hearing environment. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in your outcome. You can see the Franklin TN hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Franklin TN

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 10 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 29% to 76% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions