SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tom L. Morris

Last decided SeattleSep 2019
Decisions 600since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. The 21% approval rate for Tom L. Morris reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 21% to 93% range seen among the bench of 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle. With 600 decisions on record, this data provides a view of past activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 21%
Decisions on record 600

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Morris. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morris's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morris
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Tom L. Morris shows a trend across the 600 decisions on record since 2016. The data indicates an approval rate of 26% in 2016, 23% in 2017, 17% in 2018, and 12% in 2019. This pattern reflects the shift in approvals over the observed window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morris's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seattle hearing office

Tom L. Morris's most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office, with decisions there through September 2019. This office serves the Washington region and maintains a bench of 22 judges whose most recent record is at this location. You can expect a formal process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle, and their approval rates on record since 2016 range from 21% to 93%. Because assignment is outside of your control, understanding the broader bench is useful for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions