SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Thomas M. Muth II

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Mobile Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,349 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Muth II?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Muth II currently maintains an 80% approval rate in the latest reporting period, which is 11 percentage points higher than the national average of 58%. This data is drawn from a docket of 17,349 lifetime decisions. Comparing these figures to the Mobile Hearing Office average of 73% provides context for your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Muth II Mobile National
Approval rate 69% 73% 58%
Fully favorable 78%
Denials 20%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Muth II's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Muth II
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Muth II has shown a steady approval pattern that saw a notable increase in recent years. After maintaining rates between 65% and 73% for much of the last decade, the approval rate rose to 80% in 2024 and 2025. This recent uptick reflects a shift in the latest reporting period compared to the lifetime average of 69%. Such trends may be influenced by changes in the types of cases heard or the quality of evidence presented in recent dockets.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Muth II's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Muth II? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

The Mobile Hearing Office serves you across Alabama, managing a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 73%, reflecting regional trends in disability adjudication. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Mobile Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Mobile Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 54% to 76%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions