Mark Naggi has a 77% lifetime approval rate across 3,294 decisions on record since 2016 at the Kansas City hearing office. While your recent approval rate has reached 90%, these figures represent past patterns rather than specific predictions for your hearing. Because case assignment is random, understanding your judge's history is a vital step in your preparation. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rates for Mark Naggi reflect a significant body of work, with 3,294 lifetime decisions providing a stable statistical foundation. When compared to the 33% to 77% lifetime approval range seen across the Kansas City bench, your record stands out. In the most recent reporting period, your 90% approval rate outperformed the national average of 58% by 32 percentage points. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Naggi's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, the approval trend for Mark Naggi has shown a distinct upward trajectory. After a period of relative stability between 2019 and 2022, the rate began a consistent climb, reaching 90% in the latest reporting period. This recent shift marks a departure from your earlier lifetime average, suggesting a change in case outcomes. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Naggi's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Kansas City hearing office
The Kansas City hearing office serves you across Missouri and the surrounding region. With a bench of 17 judges on record, the office maintains an active docket to manage local disability claims. The office-wide latest approval rate is 56%, providing a baseline for the region. You can see the Kansas City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 12 of whom reported data in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, ranging from 33% to 77% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Mark Naggi maintains a 77% lifetime approval rate, which sits at the high end of the 33% to 77% lifetime range observed among the 17 judges on record at the Kansas City office. An attorney can help you understand how your specific medical evidence aligns with the expectations of this bench.
Yes, the data shows a clear upward trend in recent years. While your lifetime rate is 77%, your approval rate in the latest reporting period reached 90%, compared to 70% in 2022. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the evidentiary standards this judge currently requires.
No. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. You cannot choose your judge, which is why it is important to be prepared for any ALJ assigned to your case.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions and is not a guarantee of how they will rule on your specific claim. Your success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and how well you present your limitations. An attorney can help you gather the necessary documentation to build a strong case.



