Kim Soo Nagle is an ALJ at the Special Review Cadre with a lifetime approval rate of 50% across 14,148 lifetime decisions. This sits below the national average of 58%. Because case assignment is random, your hearing outcome depends on the strength of your medical evidence. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare a case tailored to this judge's bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Nagle has issued 14,148 lifetime decisions over a 10-year career. In the most recent reporting period, you would find an approval rate of 57%, which compares to the Special Review Cadre office average of 66% and the national average of 58%. These figures offer a view into historical trends rather than a guarantee of future results.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Nagle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a decade on the bench, Judge Nagle has seen fluctuating approval rates, ranging from a low of 38% in 2020 to a high of 69% in 2024. The data indicates that your judge's approval rate has trended upward in recent years compared to earlier career periods. While the latest period shows a 57% approval rate, this reflects a continuation of a more active recent pattern in decision-making.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Nagle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Special Review Cadre, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 63%. This variance highlights why focusing on the quality and completeness of your medical documentation is essential for your success.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.



