Lynn Neugebauer is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Bronx Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 66% across 7,225 lifetime decisions. This rate is 8 percentage points above the national average of 58%. These figures reflect past performance and do not predict the outcome of your specific case. An attorney can help you prepare your evidence to meet the requirements for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Neugebauer maintains an approval rate that tracks above both the Bronx Hearing Office average of 59% and the national average of 58%. With a docket spanning 7,225 lifetime decisions, the data provides a stable look at how cases have been handled over the last four years. Comparing these figures to the state average of 65% helps contextualize the judge's position within the broader New York disability landscape.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Neugebauer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a four-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has shown a steady pattern following an initial high in 2016. After reaching 78% in the first year, the rate stabilized between 63% and 67% in subsequent reporting periods. This consistency suggests a reliable approach to evaluating your evidence and testimony.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Neugebauer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Neugebauer? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Bronx hearing office
The Bronx Hearing Office serves a high volume of claimants across the New York region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a complex caseload that requires efficient processing of medical and vocational evidence. The office-wide latest approval rate of 59% reflects the standards applied to disability claims in this jurisdiction.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Neugebauer is essentially random. Within the Bronx Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 45% to 68%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the hearing room, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
