SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John Noel

Last decided HartfordJul 2026
Decisions 3,988since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure the data is meaningful. While John Noel has a 55% approval rate on record since 2016, recent performance shows a 68% approval rate in the latest reporting period, which sits 9 percentage points above the Hartford office average of 59%. These figures are derived from a large docket of 3,988 decisions, providing a stable view of past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 3,988
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Noel Hartford National
Approval rate 68% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 62% — —
Denials 32% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Noel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Noel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your judge's approval rate has shown a clear upward trend since 2016, rising from 34% in the early part of the record to 73% in 2025. This pattern reflects a significant shift in decision-making over the last decade across 3,988 total decisions. While the 2026 fiscal year-to-date figure of 68% remains high, it represents a partial year of data. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern of higher approval rates compared to the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Noel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Hartford hearing office

John Noel's most recent office on record is the Hartford hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants throughout Connecticut and the surrounding region. With a bench of 9 judges, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 59%. You can expect a formal administrative process where evidence quality and medical documentation are the primary factors in your outcome. You can see the Hartford Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Hartford

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the specific judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file from July 2026. Approval rates among this bench range from 27% to 74% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions