SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary Beth O'Connor

Last decided San RafaelSep 2020
Decisions 1,134since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same data window to ensure accuracy. The most relevant comparison is the range of 43% to 79% observed among the 8 judges whose most recent office on record is San Rafael. This range reflects the variance in how different judges weigh evidence and testimony. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 1,134

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge O'Connor. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge O'Connor's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge O'Connor
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The 1,134 decisions on record since 2016 show a fluctuating approval trend. After maintaining a 45% approval rate in 2016 and 2017, the rate shifted to 33% in 2018, 49% in 2019, and 55% in 2020. This variation suggests that the approach to case evidence has evolved over the period of record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge O'Connor's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Rafael hearing office

Mary Beth O'Connor's most recent office on record is the San Rafael hearing office, with decisions there through September 2020. This office serves claimants in California. With 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, you may encounter a variety of judicial approaches.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Rafael

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is San Rafael, with approval rates ranging from 43% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence remains the most effective way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions