SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark A. O'Hara

Last decided CharlottesvilleSep 2019
Decisions 730since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how a judge compares to peers requires looking at consistent data windows. The 20% approval rate for Mark A. O'Hara reflects every decision on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 20% to 82% range observed among other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlottesville. These figures provide a statistical baseline derived from hundreds of cases.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 20%
Decisions on record 730

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge O'Hara. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge O'Hara's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge O'Hara
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mark A. O'Hara across 730 decisions on record since 2016 shows a fluctuating pattern. After an initial approval rate of 17% in 2016, the rate rose to 27% in 2017 before shifting to 23% in 2018 and 12% in 2019. These yearly variations highlight how case outcomes can shift over time. The data reflects the judge's recorded activity through September 2019.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge O'Hara's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charlottesville hearing office

Mark A. O'Hara's most recent office on record is the Charlottesville hearing office, where the last recorded decision occurred in September 2019. This office serves you in Virginia and is part of a broader regional network of hearing locations. With a diverse bench of 13 judges, the office maintains its own internal standards for evaluating disability claims.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlottesville

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is Charlottesville, with approval rates ranging from 20% to 82% on their since-2016 records. Because every judge brings a unique approach to the hearing room, the specific judge assigned to your case is a significant variable.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions