Brian A. Oakes is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Montgomery Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 53% over 5,364 decisions. While his recent approval rate of 71% sits above the national average of 58%, aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both their career-long history and recent trends. Judge Oakes has issued 5,364 lifetime decisions, providing a substantial data set for analysis. While the latest approval rate of 71% shows a recent shift, it is important to view this against the broader office average of 69% and the national average of 58%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Oakes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Your judge's career shows a clear evolution in decision-making. After an initial approval rate of 48% in 2023 and 43% in 2024, the most recent data from 2025 indicates a rise to 68%. This trend suggests that the judge's approach to evidence and case requirements has become more favorable in the latest reporting period. Such shifts are common as a judge gains experience on the bench and refines their interpretation of complex medical records.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Oakes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Oakes? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Montgomery hearing office
The Montgomery Hearing Office serves a large population across Alabama, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 69%. You may face significant wait times in this region, making thorough preparation of your medical evidence essential for a successful hearing. You can see the Montgomery Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Montgomery office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 53% to 78%. This variance highlights why understanding the local bench is helpful, even though the core requirements for disability remain consistent. You can find more information on the Montgomery Hearing Office page.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
