SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian A. Oakes

Last decided MontgomeryJul 2026
Decisions 1,271since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Brian A. Oakes has an approval rate of 62% across his record since 2023, his latest-period performance shows an approval rate of 77%. This latest figure sits 6 points above the Montgomery office average of 71%, 15 points above the state average, and 19 points above the national average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 1,271
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Oakes Montgomery National
Approval rate 77% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 75% — —
Denials 23% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Oakes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Oakes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The data for Brian A. Oakes shows an upward trend in approval rates since 2023. After an approval rate of 53% in 2023 and 45% in 2024, the rate rose to 70% in 2025 and reached 77% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 1,271 total decisions on record, this shift indicates a change in recent outcomes compared to the earlier data points in the window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Oakes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Montgomery hearing office

The Montgomery hearing office serves you across Alabama and the surrounding region. It maintains a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a formal administrative process where evidence quality is the primary driver of the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Montgomery

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 9 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 21% to 92% on their respective records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions