SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jack F. Ostrander

Last decided BirminghamSep 2016
Decisions 52since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the data in context. The 44% approval rate for Jack F. Ostrander is based on 52 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the broader bench range of 28% to 85% for judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 52

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ostrander. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ostrander's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ostrander
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The data for Jack F. Ostrander covers a window from January 2016 through September 2016. With 52 decisions on record, the approval rate of 44% represents the judge's activity during this specific period. Because this data window is limited to 2016, the pattern reflects a snapshot of activity during that time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ostrander's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

Jack F. Ostrander's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, which serves you if you are in Alabama. With 23 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the bench is diverse in its decision-making history. You can see the Birmingham Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham, with approval rates ranging from 28% to 85% on their since-2016 records. While these rates vary, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent across the office.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions