Nadine Overton is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Philadelphia Hearing Office, with a lifetime approval rate of 48% over 2,032 lifetime decisions. This sits below the national average of 58%. While these statistics provide a helpful look at past trends, they are not a prediction for your specific hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not individual outcomes, and your case's success depends primarily on the medical evidence you present. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific evidentiary standards required in this office.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Overton maintains a lifetime approval rate of 48%, which currently tracks 7 points below the Philadelphia office average and 10 points below the national average. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,032 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Overton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over her 2 years on the bench, Judge Overton has maintained a consistent approach to disability claims. Her approval rate moved from 49% in 2016 to 46% in 2017. This variation is common and often aligns with shifts in the types of medical evidence presented in the cases assigned to her.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Overton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Overton? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Philadelphia hearing office
The Philadelphia Hearing Office serves a large population across Pennsylvania, managing a volume of SSDI claims with a team of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 55%, which serves as a baseline for the region. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Philadelphia Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Philadelphia Hearing Office, the bench features a range of approval rates, spanning from 41% to 70% across the 6 presiding judges. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is essential.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
