SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nadine Overton

Last decided PhiladelphiaSep 2017
Decisions 332since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 47% approval rate for Nadine Overton reflects her decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 42% to 78% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Philadelphia. With 332 decisions on record, the data provides a view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 332

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Overton. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Overton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Overton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Nadine Overton across 332 decisions on record since 2016 shows a consistent pattern. In 2016, the approval rate was 49% over 368 decisions, followed by 45% over 198 decisions in 2017. This trend reflects the judge's historical activity during the recorded period. The data indicates a steady approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Overton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Philadelphia hearing office

Nadine Overton's most recent office on record is the Philadelphia hearing office, with decisions there through September 2017. This office serves claimants in Pennsylvania and the surrounding region, maintaining a bench of 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Philadelphia

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Philadelphia, with approval rates ranging from 42% to 78% on their since-2016 records. Four of these judges decided cases in the most recent SSA file from July 2026. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions