SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Windell R. Owens

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Jackson Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 4,175 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Owens?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Owens maintains a lifetime approval rate of 60% based on 4,175 total decisions. When compared to the latest reporting period, the judge currently trends 5 percentage points above the Jackson office average and 2 points above the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the judge's history on the bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Owens Jackson National
Approval rate 60% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 51%
Denials 40%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Owens's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Owens
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a two-year tenure, Judge Owens has demonstrated a consistent decision-making pattern. The approval rate moved from 59% in 2016 to 61% in 2017, reflecting a stable approach to case evaluation. This trend suggests that the methodology remains steady as the docket progresses. The recent data indicates a continuation of this established pattern, which is helpful for you as you prepare your evidence.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Owens's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Owens? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jackson hearing office

The Jackson Hearing Office serves a broad region, managing a high volume of disability claims through its bench of 4 judges. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 55%, reflecting the local caseload and regional economic factors. If you are appearing here, you should be prepared for a thorough review of medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Jackson Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Jackson office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 45% to 60%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evidence, understanding the office-wide environment is useful. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions