SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stacy Paddack

Last decided Tallahassee Fl OHOJul 2026
Decisions 3,150since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating an approval rate requires looking at the volume of work to ensure the data is statistically significant. With 3,150 decisions on record since 2016, the data for Stacy Paddack provides a clear view of historical decision-making patterns. You can compare this long-term record against the 34% to 77% range seen among other judges at the same office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 77%
Decisions on record 3,150
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Paddack Tallahassee Fl OHO National
Approval rate 86% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 52% — —
Denials 14% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Paddack's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Paddack
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Stacy Paddack has shown a positive trend. In the latest reporting period, you would see an 86% approval rate, which stands 18 points above the office average, 27 points above the state average, and 28 points above the national average for the same timeframe. This recent performance reflects a consistent upward trajectory in decision-making.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Paddack's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tallahassee Fl OHO hearing office

The most recent office on record for Stacy Paddack is the Tallahassee FL OHO, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves you throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 9 judges who handle a wide variety of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate for the latest period was 68%, providing a baseline for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tallahassee Fl OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 34% to 77% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions