SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Denise Pasvantis

Last decided Ft LauderdaleJul 2026
Decisions 3,633since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

While Denise Pasvantis maintains a 50% approval rate across her record since 2016, her latest-period performance shows a 51% approval rate. This latest figure aligns with the Ft Lauderdale office average of 51%, though it remains below the state rate of 59% and the national average of 58%. These metrics are derived from a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable basis for analysis.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 3,633
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pasvantis Ft Lauderdale National
Approval rate 51% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 45% — —
Denials 49% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pasvantis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pasvantis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Denise Pasvantis has issued 3,633 decisions on record. Her yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a period of decline followed by a recent recovery in allowance rates. While the 2021 approval rate dipped to 42%, the data from 2024 and 2025 shows a return to higher levels of 55% and 53% respectively. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, suggesting that recent decisions remain consistent with her broader historical performance.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pasvantis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Ft Lauderdale hearing office

The Ft Lauderdale hearing office serves you throughout Florida and the surrounding region. As of the most recent office on record in July 2026, the office maintains a bench of 19 judges. You can expect a standard hearing process where the focus remains on the medical and vocational evidence you present.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Ft Lauderdale

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 10 of them having decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 87% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions