SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anne H. Pate

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Dallas North Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 12,961 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Pate?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Pate's lifetime approval rate of 46% sits 12 percentage points below the national average of 58% and 19 points below the current Dallas North office average of 65%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of 12,961 lifetime decisions over 4 years on the bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Pate Dallas North National
Approval rate 46% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 39%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pate's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pate
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 4-year tenure, Judge Pate has presided over 12,961 lifetime decisions. The yearly trend shows a fluctuating pattern, moving from 46% in 2016 to 49% in 2017, followed by 42% in 2018 and 47% in 2019. This variation suggests that your judge's recent decisions have remained relatively consistent with their career-long average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pate's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Pate? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dallas North hearing office

The Dallas North hearing office serves you across the northern region of Texas. This office manages a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges and maintains a recent office-wide approval rate of 65%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Dallas North Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Dallas North hearing office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 46% to 80%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent across the entire bench. You can review the full office roster on the Dallas North hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions