Charles C. Pearce is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Hattiesburg Hearing Office, where he has maintained a 51% lifetime approval rate over 7,238 decisions. This rate sits 7 percentage points below the national average of 58%. While these figures provide a statistical baseline, they represent past outcomes rather than a prediction for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench and ensure your medical evidence is properly presented.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Pearce maintains a lifetime approval rate of 51%, a figure derived from 7,238 decisions during his tenure. Compared to the latest reporting period, his performance is 3 points above the Hattiesburg Hearing Office average of 48% and 7 points below the national average of 58%. These statistics provide a broad view of his judicial history, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific case.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pearce's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 3 years on the bench, Judge Pearce has demonstrated a consistent decision-making pattern. His approval rate was 48% in 2016, 56% in 2017, and 51% in 2018. This trend reflects a stable approach to the evidence presented in his courtroom.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pearce's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Pearce? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Hattiesburg hearing office
The Hattiesburg Hearing Office serves a significant population of applicants across Mississippi. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases and maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 48%. If you are appearing here, you should be prepared for a formal process focused on your medical documentation and vocational evidence. You can visit the Hattiesburg Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Hattiesburg Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 26% to 63%. Because of this variance, understanding the local environment is helpful, but the core requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
