SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary Jane Pelton

Last decided SyracuseJul 2026
Decisions 1,453since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent periods to ensure accuracy. While the office-wide approval rate for the latest period is 57%, Mary Jane Pelton's latest-period rate is 47%, which is 10 percentage points lower than the office average. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a stable basis for comparison.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 1,453
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pelton Syracuse National
Approval rate 47% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 42% — —
Denials 53% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pelton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pelton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2023, Mary Jane Pelton has maintained a steady approval pattern across 1,453 decisions on record. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 46% in 2023 to 51% in 2024, followed by 44% in 2025 and 46% in 2026 fiscal year to date. The latest period rate of 47% remains consistent with this overall average. This pattern suggests that the judge's approach to evidence and testimony has remained relatively stable over the recent reporting window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pelton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Syracuse hearing office

Mary Jane Pelton's most recent office on record is the Syracuse hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 13 judges. The office-wide approval rate for the latest period is 57%, which provides a broader context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Syracuse

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 7 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among these peers range from 40% to 86% on their records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions