SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert J. Phares

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Raleigh Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 8,787 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Phares?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Phares maintains a lifetime approval rate of 64%, which compares to the Raleigh Hearing Office latest average of 62% and the national latest approval rate of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 8,787 lifetime decisions over his 3-year tenure. While these statistics provide a useful baseline for understanding the judicial environment, they are not a guarantee of any specific outcome. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Phares Raleigh National
Approval rate 64% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Phares's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Phares
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 3 years on the bench, Judge Phares has demonstrated a shifting approval trend. His rate was 65% in 2016, 68% in 2017, and 59% in 2018. This fluctuation often reflects changes in the complexity of cases or the specific medical evidence presented during those periods. Despite these yearly shifts, his overall performance remains consistent with a high-volume administrative environment.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Phares's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Phares? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

The Raleigh Hearing Office serves a large population across North Carolina, managing a high volume of SSDI and SSI claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 62%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the review of medical records and vocational testimony. You can see the Raleigh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Raleigh Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 40% to 69%. Because each judge approaches evidence differently, it is important to understand the broader context of the office. You can find more information on the Raleigh Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions