SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Katie H. Pierce

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nhc Albuquerque Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 11,457 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Pierce?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Pierce maintains a lifetime approval rate of 61% across 11,457 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, her 54% approval rate outperformed the office average by 11 percentage points and the national average by 3 percentage points. These figures provide a statistical baseline for her courtroom approach. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Pierce Nhc Albuquerque National
Approval rate 61% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pierce's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pierce
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 10 years on the bench, your judge has shown a varied yearly trend in approval rates. While her career began with steady approval levels near 60%, recent years have seen fluctuations, including a shift in 2023 followed by a return toward her historical average in 2025. This pattern reflects the complex nature of disability adjudication. The recent data suggests a stabilization in her decision-making process after a period of volatility.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pierce's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Pierce? A free benefit check tells you if you qualify.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nhc Albuquerque hearing office

The NHC Albuquerque Hearing Office serves you throughout New Mexico and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, this office manages a high volume of disability hearings annually. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 50%. You can see the NHC Albuquerque Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the NHC Albuquerque bench, lifetime approval rates for judges range from 41% to 61%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evidence, understanding the office-wide landscape is helpful. You can find more information on the NHC Albuquerque Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions